Bronx-Westchester Academy of Physicians
Chapter of NYSAFP
 
 
Awards
Board
Past Courses
dLinks
eJournal
Photos
Newsletter
Hall of Fame
Calendar
Downloads 
Messages
   
NASAT
 
 
 
 
New York Academic Minerva Web Journal
January 2006 Volume 6, Number 01
 
Paper 0601:     
Determinants of Pneumonia/Flu  Immunization Among The Elderly In Jamaica, NY
Peter Asafo-Adjei MD
Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine
St. Vincent’s Catholic Medical Center (BQ), New York Medical College, Jamaica, NY
Objectives:
To determine the rate of Immunization against Pneumonia and Influenza among the elderly at JSPOA Senior Center
To assess Knowledge, Attitudes and Past experience with Pneumonia/Flu vaccination
To find out the factors influencing the Immunization Rate
Introduction:
Each year influenza and pneumonia account for 50,000 to 80,000 deaths[1,2] and about 400,000 hospitalizations in the US[3,4].
The total economic cost of treating these vaccine-preventable diseases among adults exceeds $10 billion each year, excluding the value of years lost[5].
Vaccination can prevent about 50% of deaths from pneumococcal diseases and 80% of deaths from influenza -related complications in the elderly [1].
Cost Effectiveness of Vaccination   
Vaccination is the most cost-effective method for preventing influenza and reducing hospitalization for influenza and pneumonia for community-dwelling elderly individuals in all risk categories[6,7].
Vaccination Goals for the US Population
The federal government, through Healthy People 2010, has set an influenza and pneumonia vaccination goal of at least 90%  for adults aged>_65yrs[8].
Evidence of Unmet Needs
Although studies have demonstrated the value of immunizations in reducing deaths, hospitalizations and savings in health care costs [9,10]:
the rates of immunization continue to be far below the Healthy People 2010 goal  nationally [11]and even worse in the Jamaica community we studied
Mortality due to Influenza
Influenza associated deaths in the United States have increased significantly over the past two decades, with 90% occurring among the elderly[12]
Ethnic disparities in immunization rates
According to CDC, African Americans and Hispanics are less likely than whites to be vaccinated, indicating that there is a need to target education about vaccination for African American populations.
Rationale
Pneumonia/Flu is the 5th Leading cause of death among the community and 85% of these are those >_65yrs.[13]
It is also the 3rd leading cause of hospitalization among the same category of people from 2000 survey[14].
From 2002, a New York survey showed Flu vaccination rate varies significantly by race with whites having 67% vs. African-Americans at 52% in NYC[15].
Exposure to vaccinated staff reduces flu rates in institutions
Data showed that patients in long term care facilities where more than 60% of the staff has been vaccinated experience less flu related illness and death compared with patients in facilities where fewer staff members have been vaccinated[16].
Geographic Disparities in Immunization Rates
From 2001-2002 self reported survey the average Flu immunization rate in NYC was about 63% compared to below 50% among the population in Jamaica.
Pneumonia Vaccination
Pneumococcal polyssaccharide vaccine (PPV) reduces the risk of bacterial complications of influenza infection[16].
The increasing prevalence of penicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistant pneumococcal strains underscores the importance of primary prevention through vaccination of high risk populations [16] .
In 2002 the overall prevalence of penicillin resistance among s.pneumoniae isolates in New York city was 26.7%[16].
Risks of Pneumonia in NYC and Jamaica
In 2001 NYC survey 50% of persons >_65yrs of age have had PPV,
racial and ethnic disparities remain a problem with only 40% coverage among African-American and 45% among Hispanics[16].
In Jamaica, mortality statistics shows more people >65yrs are dying each year from Pneumonia/Flu with rate of 125,131,158 per 100000 in 1997,1998,and 1999 respectively.
Method
A questionnaire was designed and distributed to seniors 65 yrs and over attending JSPOA Senior Center.
The questionnaire evaluated:  Age,sex,race/Ethnicity,level of education, Income ,insurance, accessibility to health care facility, PCP, side effects of vaccines, employment, comorbidities/Chronic dx, and knowledge, attitudes and past experience with vaccination
Jamaica Elderly Pop. In % cf with NYC
Increase in the Elderly Population at Greatest Risk of Flu Complications(75-84)
Access to medical care in Jamaica vs. NYC
Percent of adults receiving flu shots, 2001
Leading Causes of Hospitalization in Adults in Jamaica vs. NY, 2001
Conclusion:
The 1994 NVAC report on adult immunization concluded that `Better public understanding of the seriousness of vaccine-preventable diseases and the benefits of vaccination will be essential if there are to be improvements in immunization`[18]
Educating public and health care providers is the cornerstone of an effective vaccination strategy.[19]
What can FP’s do:  Importance of Education in Increasing Immunization Rate
Many studies have  shown that education improves immunization rate
We will use this fact and any others that may be revealed in the survey in designing the intervention.
References:
1 Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine. MMWR 1988;37:64-8,73-6          
2.Prevention and Control of Influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR-1996;45(RR-5):1-24             
3.Prevention and Control of Influenza: Recommendations of ACIP;MMWR:1997;46(RR-8):1-24

NYAMWJ 2006, 6:Abstract 0601
Presented to the Fifth BWAFP Research Forum
Paper 0602: 
Patient Attitudes Towards Smoking Cessation in a Family Practice Teaching Clinic
Loulou M, MD, Schlussel YR, PhD, Enubuzor H, MD, Xu X, MD. Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine, St. Vincent’s Catholic Medical Center, Jamaica, NY

The Problem
Smoking is the largest single preventable cause of death and disease in the US
OBJECTIVES:
Why do screening?
To determine the factors that influence smoking cessation
To emphasize the role of primary care physician in helping smokers to quit
To examine the degree of awareness of smoking risks
Design of the Study
a survey of 36 patients presenting to an urban family practice clinic attended by minorities
patients screened in each  family practice clinic by Resident Physician
Setting
An urban family practice clinic serving a large African-American and Hispanic community in Jamaica, New York
36 Patients were given a survey containing 44 questions regarding their knowledge of and experience with smoking cessation.
Demographic Characteristics of Patients Surveyed
36 patients aged 18-73 completed the survey.
Main Outcome Measures
Proportion of patients who are motivated or willing to quit smoking
by length of time smoking and amount
controlling for demographics
Controlling for number of times quit in past
RESULTS:
Of the 86% who are willing to quit smoking, 69% don’t know enough about cessation methods to try it
Therefore, there is an unmet need for more knowledge about smoking cessation in primary care
Discussion:
 
Why is it important to assess willingness to quit in FP Patients?
Nicotine is one of the strongest addictions
Smokers hold various beliefs about smoking
Doctors need to consider how to communicate risk without confrontation
Smoking cessation may control referral costs for specialized care, reduce visits for comorbid conditions in primary care
How can MD’s change attitudes about smoking cessation?
Family physicians can educate themselves and their patients about smoking cessation
In recent surveys, the majority of  primary care physicians were moderately interested in using alternative therapies with patients
Limitations of the study
Although this study was limited in sample size and practice variation, it demonstrates that knowledge and practice of smoking cessation in an urban primary care sample of patients is:
not widespread
dependent on educational attainment
may increase if patient willingness is high
Conclusions:
There is an unmet need for increasing knowledge and use of smoking cessation counseling in the family practice setting.
While the willingness to attend smoking cessation classes is high, current practice is considerably lower
Only by educating both patients and family physicians, can we address how this gap may be bridged.
The implementation of smoking cessation by FPs can be significantly improved by:
Brief, repeated nonjudgmental advice by a FP
the adoption of a systematic (whole practice) approach to smoking cessation,
a more strategic approach to counseling
 Motivational interviewing techniques to provide brief, behavioral counseling to patients who smoke
more effective use of practice nurses for follow-up
NYAMWJ 2006, 6:Abstract 0602
Presented to the Fifth BWAFP Research Forum

 

Paper 0603:
Secondary Prevention Of Heart Disease In Ethnically Diverse Women
O. Karantoni, Md, T. Reid, Md, Y. Schlussel, Phd, and M. Rodriguez, Md
Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, Brooklyn And Queens Service Division, New York Medical College, Jamaica, NY

BACKGROUND:  Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in adults in the US, accounting for 1/3 of all deaths in people > 35 years old. Contributory modifiable risk factors for heart disease include HTN, lipid disorders, diabetes, smoking, obesity and physical activity.  Heart disease mortality in all women is 401/100,000.  The highest mortality rates are seen in African American women (553/100,000), white women (388/100,000) and Hispanic women (265/100,000). 
OBJECTIVE:  To determine the factors that affect adherence to medication therapy and life-style modification in women greater than age 40 with identifiable risk factors for heart disease such as diabetes, HTN, hypercholesterolemia and obesity.  An intervention will then be implemented to improve adherence.
STUDY DESIGN:  Site:  St. Dominic’s Family Practice Center in Jamaica, New York.  Surveys with question on demographics, SES, health (including knowledge of their disease condition, medication and risk factors for heart disease), dietary behaviors and compliance to medication, office visit and life-style modification were administered to 40 participants.  Consent was obtained for all participants.  Survey conducted via face to face interview by 2 FP residents.
Data Analysis:  Data was analyzed using SAS v. 8.2. 
Results:  Problems with compliance: 1. Majority needed to be told to take meds at same time.  2.  Many needed to be reminded to take meds.  3.  Some needed to be told to take meds every day.
CONCLUSIONS:  Extended families may be a source of stress to women who have chronic disease, and many responsibilities:  58% had 1-2 children age 29-32 who lived at home, 40% took care of their young children. 
Patients will be educated on their health condition (Diabetes mellitus, HTN, high cholesterol and obesity), and the importance of adhering to medication regimen and life-style modification.  All the patients will then be given paper diaries to record modification in the behavior they are trying to improve and half of the study population will be randomly assigned to be given electronic organizers that remind them of their appointment and when to take their medication.  Patients will be re-evaluated in three months and data analyze to assess improvement in compliance and risk factors.

NYAMWJ 2006, 6:Abstract 0603
Presented to the Fifth BWAFP Research Forum
Paper 0604:
Breastfeeding and Attitudes of Residents
Elizabeth Natal,  PGY2 Resident, Family Medicin
Montefiore FMRP, Bronx, NY.
Background
: Many organizations have documented the benefits of breastfeeding both for the mother and the infant.  Among these are nutritional, immunologic, economic, environmental and psychological benefits.  Due to this the American Academy of Pediatrics, the World Health Organization, UNICEF and other leading organizations recommend at least six months of exclusive breastfeeding, with continued breastfeeding to at least one years old or after.  Despite these recommendations, the Healthy People 2010 report states that the breastfeeding rate at 6 months continues to fall below the recommended level.  In 1998 64% of postpartum mothers were breastfeeding, but by the 6th month only 29% had continued.  The Healthy People 2010 goal is to have 75% of early postpartum mothers breastfeeding and 50% continuation at 6 months.   The CDC guide to Breastfeeding Intervention stated a Cochrane review found that institutional changes in maternity care practices effectively increased breastfeeding initiation and duration rates.  It also stated that educating hospital staff with a training program enhanced compliance with maternity practices and increased rates of breastfeeding.  This information stands to reason that an educational intervention to train family medicine residents should also assist in increasing the knowledge, attitudes and clinic behavioral practice of residents, as well as increase the rates of breastfeeding. 
The question this study is trying to address is what level of intervention is required to improve residents’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.  A new form of intervention will be compared with a prior instituted one day a week four-session breastfeeding curriculum held onsite during the obstetric rotation of first year family medicine residents at Weiler Hospital.  The study is being designed to evaluate if there is any difference in the knowledge, attitudes and practices of residents, as well as the breastfeeding rates of patients whose residents receive a two session off-site intervention versus the formal four session breastfeeding curriculum.  The educational intervention will include a one-hour didactic lecture and an additional workshop that will involve role-playing activities, practice in the mechanics of breastfeeding and the presentation of video clips on breastfeeding. 
Objective: To determine what impact a new two-session educational intervention would have on the knowledge, attitudes and clinical practices of residents, when compared to the prior formally administered four-session breastfeeding curriculum implemented to Montefiore Medical Residents undergoing their obstetrical rotation at Weiler Hospital.  This study will also try to assess if there is any difference in the breastfeeding rates of the two groups.  The idea is to try to determine if one intervention is better at improving overall breastfeeding rates. 
Setting:  The site for the study is the Montefiore Family Medicine Residency Program in Social Medicine located in the Bronx, New York.  The residents are from two local family health centers.  The Montefiore Medical Group Fordham Family Health Center being one and the Williamsbridge Family Health Center being the other.  The Fordham site consists of a predominantly underserved area.  It serves a large Latino population, a large African American population and a growing Asian community.  Medicaid insures a good majority of the patients in this community.
Participants: The participants of the study will be first year residents of an urban family medicine residency.  All residents under study come from the Montefiore Family Medicine Residency Program in Social Medicine.  The current PGY2 class of 2007 will be the initial comparison group who received the prior implemented formal breastfeeding training.  The current PGY1 class of 2008 will be the experimental group and will receive the new two session educational intervention.  Chart reviews will be done to evaluate the breastfeeding rates of patients under the care of residents from both groups.  All residents of the current PGY1 class will be included as long as they participate in the pre-survey, educational interventions and post-survey.  The only patients whose data will be excluded from the study will be patients who have contraindications for breastfeeding (HIV, active illicit drug users, active/untreated T.B, certain prescribed drugs, etc… )
Method: This will be a partially quantitative prospective and partially quantitative retrospective cohort study.  The study will involve administering a pre-intervention survey, an educational intervention and a post- intervention survey to an experimental group.  The results of these surveys will then be compared to those of a group that received a different intervention, a more formal breastfeeding education.  The experimental group will complete the pre-intervention surveys prior to the intervention.  Then this group will receive an educational intervention in the form of a didactic breastfeeding lecture and/or workshop, followed by a post-intervention survey.  The purpose of the surveys is to evaluate two different interventional styles to determine if either style has a greater impact on residents’ knowledge, attitudes and practice.  Furthermore, chart review will also be performed to look for any differences in breastfeeding rates between the two interventional groups.    
A chart review will be conducted to evaluate the quantity of breastfeeding discussion during the 3rd trimester visits of the two groups.  The chart review will also evaluate the breastfeeding rate for all postpartum patients at one week to one month, two months and four months.  The goal is to identify any differences in breastfeeding rates between the patients of the two groups.  The information collected will be used to assess if one form of breastfeeding intervention versus another would be more helpful in improving physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices’, as well as improve the breastfeeding rates of their patients.  
NYAMWJ 2006, 6:Abstract 0604
Presented to the Fifth BWAFP Research Forum

Paper 0605:
Prevalence of certain infectious diseases in an inner city pregnant  population.
Z. Shi, MD, A. Hamaoui, MD, and R. Mercado, DO
Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
NYAMWJ 2006, 6:Abstract 0605
Presented to the Fifth BWAFP Research Forum
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 

 



+